Generative AI and Large Language Models

Overview

Generative AI and Large Language Models (LLMs) represent a transformative shift in artificial intelligence, enabling machines to generate human-like text, understand context, and perform complex reasoning tasks. This section explores the key concepts, frameworks, and evaluation methodologies essential for working with these technologies.

Origins and Evolution

Large Language Models emerged from decades of research in natural language processing and neural networks, evolving through distinct stages that reflect fundamental shifts in approach and capability. The journey began with statistical language models (SLMs) in the 1990s, which employed probabilistic methods to model word sequences using n-gram approaches (Jelinek 1998). These early models, while foundational, faced significant limitations in handling long-range dependencies and required extensive storage for large vocabularies.

The transition to neural language models (NLMs) marked a crucial advancement, beginning with foundational work by Bengio et al. (Bengio, Ducharme, and Vincent 2000) and later refined through recurrent neural network architectures (Mikolov et al. 2010). These models introduced distributed word representations—notably through Word2Vec (Mikolov et al. 2013)—enabling machines to capture semantic relationships between words through dense vector embeddings. Unlike their statistical predecessors, NLMs could effectively model longer sequences and learn complex linguistic patterns.

The modern era of LLMs began with the transformer architecture introduced by Vaswani et al. in 2017 (Vaswani et al. 2017), which revolutionised sequence-to-sequence learning through self-attention mechanisms. This architecture eliminated the sequential processing constraints of recurrent networks, enabling fully parallel computation and superior handling of long-distance dependencies. The transformer’s design became the foundation for all subsequent large language models. For a detailed exploration of the transformer architecture and its components, see the dedicated Transformers page.

Early transformer-based models demonstrated the power of pre-training on large text corpora. BERT (Devlin et al. 2018), introduced in 2018, employed bidirectional context understanding through masked language modelling, achieving state-of-the-art results across numerous NLP tasks. Simultaneously, the GPT series emerged with GPT-1 (Radford et al. 2018) and GPT-2 (Radford et al. 2019), demonstrating the effectiveness of autoregressive language modelling and the potential for few-shot learning.

The true breakthrough came with GPT-3 (Brown et al. 2020), a 175-billion parameter model that revealed emergent capabilities absent in smaller models, including few-shot learning, chain-of-thought reasoning, and instruction following. This scaling phenomenon was further demonstrated by models like PaLM (Chowdhery et al. 2023) and LLaMA (Touvron et al. 2023), which showed that increased model size, dataset volume, and computational resources resulted in significant enhancements across various tasks (Wei et al. 2022). More recently, GPT-4 (Achiam et al. 2023) and other advanced models have continued to push the boundaries of what’s possible with language models.

This evolution was driven by three key factors: advances in computational resources, with hardware innovations enabling training of models with hundreds of billions of parameters (Kaplan et al. 2020); improved training techniques, including reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) (Ouyang et al. 2022) for alignment; and the availability of vast, diverse text datasets spanning multiple domains. These developments transformed LLMs from research curiosities into practical tools that power modern AI applications across industries, fundamentally changing how we interact with and leverage artificial intelligence (Zhao et al. 2023).

Core Concepts

Large Language Models (LLMs)

Building on the evolutionary path described above, LLMs are neural networks trained on vast amounts of text data, capable of understanding and generating human language. They form the foundation of modern generative AI applications, from chatbots to content creation tools. The transformer architecture underlying modern LLMs enables them to process and generate text with remarkable fluency and contextual understanding.

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)

RAG enhances LLMs by combining them with retrieval systems that fetch relevant information from knowledge bases. This approach allows models to access external, up-to-date information during generation, improving accuracy and reducing hallucinations.

Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA)

LoRA (Low-Rank Adaptation) is a parameter-efficient fine-tuning technique that enables adaptation of large language models to specific tasks or domains without modifying the entire model. Traditional fine-tuning approaches require updating all model parameters, which becomes computationally prohibitive for models with hundreds of billions of parameters. For instance, fine-tuning GPT-3’s 175 billion parameters would require substantial computational resources and storage (Brown et al. 2020).

Instead of updating all model parameters during fine-tuning, LoRA introduces trainable low-rank matrices that are inserted into the model’s attention layers. The technique is based on the observation that weight updates during fine-tuning often have a low “intrinsic rank”—meaning the changes can be represented efficiently using low-rank decompositions. Specifically, LoRA decomposes the weight update matrix \Delta W as the product of two smaller matrices: \Delta W = BA, where B \in \mathbb{R}^{d \times r} and A \in \mathbb{R}^{r \times k}, with the rank r typically much smaller than the original dimensions d and k.

This approach dramatically reduces the number of trainable parameters—often by orders of magnitude—while maintaining performance comparable to full fine-tuning. For example, a LoRA adapter might introduce only 0.1% of the original model’s parameters, making fine-tuning feasible on consumer hardware that would otherwise be incapable of handling such large models. The technique enables multiple task-specific adapters to coexist within a single model, allowing practitioners to maintain one base model with numerous lightweight adapters for different applications, significantly reducing storage requirements compared to maintaining separate fully fine-tuned models.

LoRA represents a practical solution for customising LLMs for diverse applications, particularly valuable in scenarios where computational resources are limited or where multiple specialised models need to be maintained efficiently. The technique has become widely adopted in the LLM community, enabling broader access to fine-tuning capabilities and facilitating the development of domain-specific and task-specific model variants without the prohibitive costs associated with full fine-tuning (Zhao et al. 2023). See the dedicated LoRA page for comprehensive details on the method, its implementation, and empirical findings.

Evaluation and Assessment

LLM Evaluation

LLM evaluation is crucial for understanding model performance and effectiveness. It involves assessing how well models generate human-like text, comprehend context, and perform specific tasks across various applications.

Tools and Frameworks

For comprehensive information about evaluation frameworks, development tools, and best practices, see the dedicated Tools and Frameworks page. This includes detailed coverage of:

  • RAGAS Framework: Specialised metrics for evaluating RAG systems
  • Llama Stack: Comprehensive development framework for generative AI applications
  • Fine-tuning techniques: Including parameter-efficient methods like LoRA for adapting models to specific use cases
  • Integration patterns and best practices
  • Getting started guidance for new developers

Key Benefits

  • Enhanced Accuracy: RAG systems provide more accurate and verifiable information
  • Fresh Knowledge: Knowledge bases can be updated independently of model training
  • Transparency: Retrieved documents provide clear sources for generated content
  • Efficiency: Techniques like LoRA reduce the computational and storage costs of fine-tuning, while RAG reduces the need for frequent model retraining

Applications

Generative AI and LLMs find applications across numerous domains: - Content generation and summarisation - Question answering systems - Code generation and assistance - Creative writing and storytelling - Educational tools and tutoring systems - Business process automation

References

Achiam, Josh, Steven Adler, Sandhini Agarwal, Lama Ahmad, Ilge Akkaya, Florencia Leoni Aleman, Diogo Almeida, et al. 2023. “Gpt-4 Technical Report.” arXiv Preprint arXiv:2303.08774.
Bengio, Yoshua, Rejean Ducharme, and Pascal Vincent. 2000. “A Neural Probabilistic Language Model.” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 13.
Brown, Tom, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared D Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, et al. 2020. “Language Models Are Few-Shot Learners.” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33: 1877–1901.
Chowdhery, Aakanksha, Sharan Narang, Jacob Devlin, Maarten Bosma, Gaurav Mishra, Adam Roberts, Paul Barham, et al. 2023. “Palm: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways.” Journal of Machine Learning Research 24 (240): 1–113.
Devlin, Jacob, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. 2018. “Bert: Pre-Training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding.” arXiv Preprint arXiv:1810.04805.
Jelinek, Frederick. 1998. “Statistical Methods for Speech Recognition.” MIT Press.
Kaplan, Jared, Sam McCandlish, Tom Henighan, Tom B Brown, Benjamin Chess, Rewon Child, Scott Gray, Alec Radford, Jeffrey Wu, and Dario Amodei. 2020. “Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models.” arXiv Preprint arXiv:2001.08361.
Mikolov, Tomas, Martin Karafiát, Lukas Burget, Jan Cernockỳ, and Sanjeev Khudanpur. 2010. “Recurrent Neural Network Based Language Model.” In Interspeech, 2:1045–48. 3. Makuhari.
Mikolov, Tomas, Ilya Sutskever, Kai Chen, Greg S Corrado, and Jeff Dean. 2013. “Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and Their Compositionality.” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 26.
Ouyang, Long, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida, Carroll Wainwright, Pamela Mishkin, Chong Zhang, et al. 2022. “Training Language Models to Follow Instructions with Human Feedback.” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35: 27730–44.
Radford, Alec, Karthik Narasimhan, Tim Salimans, Ilya Sutskever, et al. 2018. “Improving Language Understanding by Generative Pre-Training.”
Radford, Alec, Jeffrey Wu, Rewon Child, David Luan, Dario Amodei, Ilya Sutskever, et al. 2019. “Language Models Are Unsupervised Multitask Learners.” OpenAI Blog 1 (8): 9.
Touvron, Hugo, Thibaut Lavril, Gautier Izacard, Xavier Martinet, Marie-Anne Lachaux, Timothee Lacroix, Baptiste Roziere, et al. 2023. “Llama: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models.” arXiv Preprint arXiv:2302.13971.
Vaswani, Ashish, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. 2017. “Attention Is All You Need.” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30.
Wei, Jason, Yi Tay, Rishi Bommasani, Colin Raffel, Barret Zoph, Sebastian Borgeaud, Dani Yogatama, et al. 2022. “Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models.” Transactions on Machine Learning Research.
Zhao, Wayne Xin, Kun Zhou, Junyi Li, Tianyi Tang, Xiaolei Wang, Yupeng Hou, Yingqian Min, et al. 2023. “A Survey of Large Language Models.” arXiv Preprint arXiv:2303.18223.